On the Pole Shift ning a dark object has been captured on a photo, with the following information regarding the capture:

Full Moon is in the center , house light lower right and dark object upper left side. Taken March 28 5:12 am EST in North Carolina. Was not visible to the eye, only the one picture. Camera (Cannon) saw object just yesterday, during a review of the pictures taken previously.

The dark object is not visible in the photo, which shows no signs of being doctored, until the photo is brightened.

Under color inversion, the dark object emerges. It shows a shadow similar to but not exactly like the shadow on the Moon. The object's shadow is directly on the left, while the Moon's shadow has a center pointing to the upper left. Thus, it is not a reflection, or ghost as these reflections are called in camera lingo, of the Moon. Lens reflections, in any case, are equivalent in size to the bright objects, or are smaller than the object.

Skymap shows that the partially Full Moon on March 28, 2010, at 5:12 am from North Carolina is low on the horizon and at about Azimuth 270°. So the delivery man was looking west, though the Earth was not such that he was on the side of the Earth from which the Dark Twin is approaching. Nevertheless, he was looking out along the Ecliptic, in that general direction. I would think the Dark Twin would be blocked by the Earth itself, as this is just a couple hours before dawn, not midnight, and the curve of the shared orbit would likely put the Dark Twin more along the curve of the shared orbit, wrapping toward the Sun, not out there in the dark space. But, it could be somewhat out of our orbit, the shared orbit, due to trying to evade the Earth, the crowding. The Skymap diagram also shows that the dark object is closer to the Ecliptic than the Moon, as depicted in the photo.



The Moon is ¼ the diameter of Earth. Per the Zetas, the Dark Twin is approximately the same size as the Earth. Taking a measure of the diameter of the Moon in this photo and comparing to the diameter of the presumed Dark Twin, we find it is as large as 8 Moon diameters. This cannot be the actual size of the dark object, the Dark Twin. The Zetas explain.

ZetaTalk Explanation 4/10/2010: This is the Dark Twin, which has been crowding up behind the Earth in their shared orbit, but the orbit they share is no longer exact, due to the crowding. The Dark Twin has pushed back, slightly away from the Sun, to avoid crowding the Earth, in the same manner that the Earth has pushed back in her orbit to avoid the approaching Planet X. Such crowding will increase as Planet X comes outbound from the Sun, closing the gap between itself and Earth. Dramas will ensue, which we decline to detail at the present time. Why is the Dark Twin now visible when up until now has been seemingly impossible to see, having moved close up behind the Earth is their shared orbit? While the Dark Twin has been to the side of the Earth, such that light would not reflect from the Sun to the Earth as the sunlight would be returning directly to the Sun, it now has pushed back outside their shared orbit, so the opportunities for reflected sunlight to reach the Earth have increased. As a black hunk of rock, without atmosphere or water, it absorbs almost all light. This captured image does not reflect the true size of the Dark Twin, but is akin to the Monster Sun captures of Planet X, so often astonishing those who viewed them during the day, and proving when captured on film to be anything but a lens flare. Light reflected from the Dark Twin fanned out, but when captured by the gravity field of Earth bend back, presenting to the camera a large pale orb not representative of the actual size of the Dark Twin.

The Dark Twin, per the Zetas, shares the Earth's orbit but is normally hidden behind the Sun.

ZetaTalk on Earth Twin 10/15/1996: Just as your Sun has a dead twin, the second focus of Planet X's orbit, likewise your Earth has a dead twin that shares her orbit and is placed so exactly opposite the Earth that it can never be seen. Theories about the Earth's dark twin, which does exist, have been around for decades. They emerged because of the observed perturbations of the planets. This twin is close enough, within your Solar System, to be visible by the reflected rays from the Sun, if it were not hidden behind the Sun. That the dead twin matches pace with the Earth is not by coincidence. During the period when the Earth was knocked out of her initial orbit by a clash with one of Planet X's travelers, the Earth found an orbital niche around the Sun that was appropriate for her size and composition, a niche, not surprisingly, that the dead twin likewise fits. Why do these matched planets place themselves exactly opposite? Any less than this creates an imbalance in the many forces that control orbits, such that there is pressure and nudging and pulling and increased or decreased speed on one or the other until this is perfectly balanced. Put two ball bearings in a circular track and spin this, and you soon find that the balls are opposite each other. Just so do these two evenly matched planets find this position opposite each other.

The Earth's dead twin has been omitted from astronomy lists due to the unease those who were in involved in Alternative 3 have about their past actions. Mankind's awareness of this dead twin arose during the discussions that MJ12 had early on with aliens in the Service-to-Self just prior to the time of Roswell. During that time, all information learned from aliens was withheld from the public, and after the debacle that Alternative 3 became, releasing any information at all about the Earth's dead twin was doomed for the lifetime of the participants. In the same manner that the records on JFK's assassination will be sealed for several more decades, these records were sealed, to protect the guilty during their lifetimes. Who is aware of the Earth's dead twin? NASA and JPL and a handful of astronomers working at the major observatories. Just as the approach of the 12th Planet, i.e. Planet X, is know to these individuals and kept from the public, information on the dead twin is a forbidden subject. This is termed a matter of national security, subject to imprisonment and other harsh punishment, and as those who enter into this realm soon discern, even an accidental death at the hands of those who fear the release of this information. Thus, the common man, without access to the information that NASA has but won't allow the public access to, has no facts by which to arrive at the truth.

The Dark Twin became visible when the Earth was halted in her orbit in December, 2003. It was captured in a photo on January 20, 2004 in China. At the time, this odd bluish/yellowish orb was not recognized for what it was.



In May, 2004 it was again captured in a photo from Arizona.



Then in April, 2004, it was visible naked eye from Earth, many people noting a bluish/yellowish orb on the horizon, several times larger than Venus.

Magnetosphere Clues

Is there a relationship between recent quakes or signs of stress on the Earth plates and the twisting of the magnetosphere? The magnetosphere shows the loss of a S Pole, or signs of a blast of magnetic particles (magnetons) coming from the direction of the magnetic N Pole of Planet X, or twisting so that the flow of magnetons is moving in the wrong direction. These readings are obtained from a Japanese magnetosphere simulator. Prior to the 8.8 magnitude quake in Chile on February 27, the magnetosphere went from a normal appearance to loss of its S Pole. As noted on Issue 176 of this newsletter, a decided lean to the left was noted in the weeks following the magnitude 8.8 quake in Chile. GPS malfunction was noted at that time too, and in the days prior to the Chile quake.



The Mediterranean had unexplained rogue waves on March 3 and March 10 also, as noted in Issue 178 of this newsletter, the result of a silent roll of the African continent pushing the Mediterranean floor down north of Algeria. Loss of the Earth's S Pole was noted on March 1 and March 2. The rolling of the African Plate is considered a silent maneuver, thought no less devastating than a quake in its effect. This is the second time the loss of the S Pole on the magnetosphere was associated with significant plate movements.



The Zetas explained that a lean to the left is a temporary adjustment of the Earth, to evade the push against her magnetic N Pole by the aggressive and larger planetary body, Planet X, and that a reaction of a bounce to the right could also be expected during such times. Both the lean to the left and the bounce back are proving to be stressful times for the Earth.

ZetaTalk Explanation 3/6/2010: These types of temporary adjustments will occur on occasion as the Earth pulls hard to the left, to evade Planet X. All this pushing and wobbling and bouncing lurches the Earth plates, and thus they move, causing earthquakes. Where this may come and go, the pace will only increase, and certainly not go away.

Then a lull ensued, between March 8-21, when no decided lean was noted and only minor quakes occurred. This was reflected in the magnetosphere readings. No loss of the S Pole was noted during this lull. Keeping count, lull with no loss of the S Pole = 1, significant plates movement with loss of S Pole = 2.



The lull stopped on March 21-27, when the lean to the left returned, intermittently. During this period, there were quakes and signs of stress on the live seismographs in the Caribbean and continued hammering along the Andes in S America, but nothing major, as noted in Issue 178 of this newsletter. The magnetosphere reflected this stress by the loss of the Earth's S Pole repeatedly, on March 25 and 27. This is the third time the loss of the S Pole on the magnetosphere was associated with significant plate movements or plate distress. Lull with no loss of the S Pole = 1, significant plates movement or distress with loss of S Pole = 3.

Iowa, March 21

I noticed it also right away this morning! I use the water tower East of my house as the reference and this morning she was too far North!

 

San Diego, March 27

Sun was way too far North at sunset today. This wobble is getting worse.

 

Saskatchewan, March 27

Last night the stars were way off as well. The Moon was at mid-sky position when it normally would have been on the horizon. In my observations I've also noticed the Sun being in the wrong place. It was more in the NW than I've seen it before.

 

Iowa, March 27

Orion was way high North, when it should be lower SW this time of year preparing to disappear by Summer, but it was way up there last night!

Then another lull ensued, from March 28-April 1. Neither the loss of a S Pole nor a twisted magnetosphere occurred, though the magnetosphere did show it was receiving blasts. Lull with no loss of the S Pole = 2, significant plate movement or distress with loss of S Pole = 3.



Following this lull we returned to a lean to the left on April 2-3. After that, perhaps due to a bounce back to the right, two significant quakes occurred - the 7.2 in Baja on April 4 and the 7.8 in Sumatra on April 6. These quakes are significant in that both times the live seismographs went black, showing global magma sloshing. And the magnetosphere shows the stress of blasts with a twist on April 7. However, the S Pole did not go missing. Lull or lean with no loss of the S Pole = 3, significant plates movement or distress with loss of S Pole = 3.

Saskatchewan, April 2

I noticed the Sun setting in the NNW location. I haven't been able to observe the sunrise. It certainly wasn't the same as this time last year. The sunset was extreme, even I was surprised. Every other day it's been in the NW or the West. It has caused me a great deal of consternation, but I know what I saw.

 

Wisconsin, April 2

When the Sun drops over your horizon in Saskatchewan, the Azimuth should be 277°, almost directly west. For you to say NNW is extreme! At least 40° too far to the north.

 

Vancouver, April 2

The Sun seemed out of position to me. I noticed sunlight coming into my store in ways I never had, and it certainly seemed unusual walking home. My street is aligned East-West, but gauging from that, the Sun was farther to the North!

 

Iowa, April 2

My wife saw it come up in the NE also and said it was shining on the North side of the house which in the 22 years I've lived in this house has only happened in the last couple of years! The year before and now this year! The afterglow was still evident at 10 last night central time! It's been that way several nights now!

Following the Baja and Sumatra quakes, a lean to the left again ensued on April 8-9, but eased by April 11. Significantly, the live seismographs were calm, showing lack of stress. The magnetosphere did not show a missing S Pole, and no significant quakes ensued. At the end of the lean, the Solomons had a 7.1 quake which registered worldwide on the live seismographs, though they did not go entirely black. Once again, the lack of a S Pole was not present, showing this magnetosphere change might be useful as a predictive guide. Lull or lean with no loss of the S Pole = 4, significant plates movement or distress with loss of S Pole = 3.

Earth Stop Show

The National Geographic channel aired a new show focusing on a hypothetical situation where the Earth gradually stops rotating, so there is 6 months of daylight, 6 months of night for any survivors on Earth.

Aftermath: When Earth Stops Spinning
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/series/aftermath/all/Overview

Humans struggle to survive as the planet ceases to turn, throwing the climate, oceans and atmosphere into chaos.

They gave no reason for the hypothesis, just lept into the description of what might happen.Significantly, ZetaTalk predicts a rotation stoppage, though for only 5.9 days, with a fairly rapid slowing process preceding this. The Zetas were asked to comment on the differences in their view and the scenario painted by the National Geographic channel. In brief, National Geographic adhered to science only some of the time. They were given a mission to include as much of the ZetaTalk description on the last weeks and pole shift as possible, but chose to avoid the reason for rotation slowing or stoppage, or that the stoppage was temporary. In doing so, they made a jumble and had to stretch the truth.

ZetaTalk Comparison 3/10/2010: Anticipating questions on this show, Nancy watched it closely. Much confusion can be eliminated is we simply point out that the premise of the show was that the Earth slowed rotation over many months, and then settled into a 6 month day/night routine without sustaining a crustal shift. It is true that the oceans would flow toward the poles in a stopped rotation, but this process is slow and does not move that much water during a 5.9 day stopped rotation week. The amount of time that the Earth requires to slow her rotation to a stop is likewise weeks, not months, and this is on a curve so that the last few days are where the brakes are really applied. Prior to that, minutes and hours are added to a day. Thus, the effect on the Earth of a virtually stopped rotation are, in total, a week, not months.

There is another point of confusion regarding the shape of the Earth, which is an oval, fat around the Equator and not a ball. This is not caused by deeper oceans, more water, at the Equator but rather the shape of the Earth itself, the magma layer in particular. This is a fact well known to your scientists. The magma accumulates around the Equator, due to the centrifugal force of rotation. The oceans would pool around the Equator also, were it not that the poles are essentially downhill from the Equator, gravitywise, being lower and closer to the core of the Earth. Thus, the pulling of water to the Equator is offset by the oceans flowing downhill, and the water is of a consistent depth around the world. In a crustal shift, the bulging part of the globe, the fat middle part, shifts too, developing around the new Equator. Thus our warning about being 675 feet above today's sea level applies, as ocean depth will be consistent after the pole shift.

A final point of confusion was the emphasis on lack of air to breath. The great oxygenators of the Earth are the kelp forests and the algae that live in the oceans. It is not the rain forests, though they contribute of course. This would thus place the location of oxygen renewal of the atmosphere over the Equator, not the polls. In addition, as the Coriolis effect, the pushing of the atmosphere in a circle from the Equator to the polls due to the rotation of the Earth, would diminish and disappear, there would be air flow due to heating and cooling, high and low pressure points as warm air is lighter, and thus the atmosphere would be mixed. Yes, we have stated that the atmosphere will be stripped away by the lashing tail of Planet X, but unless on resides high in the mountains, this would not be noticed by survivors, and the atmosphere quickly rebuilds from the great oceans the Earth enjoys.

Why did National Geographic chose to create this strange scenario, where people are gasping for breath and dying and the cities are being flooded? They were told to include as many of the scenarios we have described for the time of the pole shift and the Aftertime, and did so by wild speculation on what might occur when science would not support the story. Yes, we have predicted that cities will flood, as they are predominantly situated along coastlines and river bottom land, and thus will experience tidal sloshing and river flooding during the hour of the shift. Yes, we have predicted that many cities will be flooded in the aftertime too, along the coastlines, due to the 675 foot rise in sea level.

We have likewise predicted that the Earth will moan as the core tries to turn but the crust is held in a stopped rotation. It is known in human science that the core drive the rotation, and rotates slightly faster than the crust itself. This conflict was depicted, and used as an excuse for a fracturing crust interfering with travel, another of our predictions for the last weeks as we have advised all who intend to travel to their safe locations to do so early and not linger for these reasons. Anticipating ocean fishing as a food source in the Aftertime, when the volcanic gloom will be diminishing, and the difficulty of establishing agriculture, plant growth, in a changed climate was also depicted, though not for the reasons we give. Sheltered gardens in the Aftertime protect from volcanic ash fallout, not intense sunlight.

You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly Unsubscribe. You can always access prior Newsletters from the Archives.