link to Home Page

ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for January 23, 2016

Earlier we had the question about the Atlantic shipping slow down. Now today I saw this article about Walmart closing over 200 stores, mostly in the US but also in Puerto Rico, Latin America, and Brazil.  A look at the map shown in the article clearly indicates the majority are store locations in the South and along the Eastern Seaboard, places where Zetas have indicated the New Madrid pre-quakes will disrupt first. The article makes it sound like Walmart is simply adjusting its business strategy to the times, but with the store locations and timing of closings paralleling the shipping slow down, is there more to this?  Has Walmart been asked to close stores at this time to hide the economic slowdown to prevent panic? The locations outside the US are interesting, too, being areas affected by the South American roll. Would the Zetas care to comment? [and from another]  Express began in 2011 as an experiment with bodega-like Walmarts in spots, mostly urban and rural areas, where the company couldn’t open the sprawling “Supercenters” for which it is best known. But they weren’t successful. [and from another]  The world's largest retailer is closing 269 stores, including 154 in the U.S. that includes all of its locations under its smallest-format concept store called Wal-Mart Express. The other big chunk is in its challenging Brazilian market. The stores being shuttered account for a fraction of the company's 11,000 stores worldwide and less than 1 percent of its global revenue. [and from another]  Even as Walmart plans to close hundreds of locations, it also intends to open more than 300 stores in the next year, including 50 to 60 supercenters in the United States and 85 to 95 Neighborhood Markets. The stores that are to be shuttered are ones that the retailer says account for less than 1 percent of global revenue. Walmart Express stores were something of mashup between a dollar store and a small grocery, offering convenience-oriented food products but not a wide array of fresh produce or meats. Of the 115 stores it is shuttering abroad, 60 are money-losing stores in Brazil.

The closing of the Wal-Mart Express line, which has never made a profit, is a non-issue when viewed through the lens of a profit driven corporations looking to the bottom line. That this store concept was “experimental”, initiated recently in 2011, allows it to be closed as an experiment that failed. It is noteworthy however that the Wal-Mart Express stores were located, by design, in poor neighborhoods that would be likely to riot with slight provocation. They are also located in a region likely to be devastated by New Madrid adjustments. The Brazilian stores are reputed to have never made a profit.

What is also noteworthy is that regular Wal-Mart and Super Centers are being closed in Baltimore, LA and San Francisco, Houston, and Los Vegas. These are big city closures or along the coastlines and the San Andreas. Supercenters are also being closed along the Seaway in Ohio and Michigan, yet many new Wal-Mart and Super Centers are planned to be opened shortly. What is clear from this pattern, though unspoken by the media or Wal-Mart management, is that they anticipate the Earth changes and the announcement. New Madrid devastation, earthquake damage along the San Andreas, rioting in big cities, and rioting in poor neighborhoods is anticipated, and Wal-Mart is making adjustments accordingly.

Do the Zetas would like to comment about the appearance of this article on the MSM? [and from another] Today on the radio, while listening to NPR, they spoke about Planet X. It is also on their website. An article on the same subject can also be found in and from Cal Tech. Three places that are by any measure, (main stream) have come out with articles about a ninth or tenth planet, depending on the article. All of these on the same day apparently. This does not look like creeping disclosure anymore but open disclosure of the existence of the planet. If you read the articles you will see that the facts about Nibiru are incorrect except for it's existence as a member of our solar system, as well as the fact that it affects certain of our other planets. What can the Zetas tell us about these preliminary admissions of the existence of planet X from several mainstream sources? Will these be used to gauge public reaction? Or perhaps will this be the setup for a more official pronouncement? [and from another] I guess this is yet another announcement nudge? Can the Zetas comment? [and from another] This news already all over Russian web. The article states that an American and Russian astronomers found some anomalies in the gravity of a few of distant planets and came to an assumption that the anomaly could be caused by a very large planet much bigger than Earth. Is this a preparation for the announcement on Nibiru?  Would the Z's care to comment? [and from another] Today, all the news channels in Russia has passed the information about the detected 9 planet in our solar system. And just yesterday Lavrov met with Kerry. It is this preparation for the upcoming announcement. [and from another] Checking the reaction of the humans and preparing for announcement? [and from another]  Astronomers at the California Institute of Technology announced on Wednesday they’d found evidence for a massive, faraway planet. If true, it would constitute the ninth planet in our solar system, an honor once bestowed on Pluto, which has since been demoted to dwarf-planet status. They’ve nicknamed the new object Planet Nine. Planet Nine’s mass is believed to be about 10 times that of Earth, and it’s distance, 20 times farther away from the sun than Pluto. Evidence of its existence comes instead from dwarf planets and other icy objects around it. [and from another]  The new evidence comes from a pair of respected planetary scientists, Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, who prepared for the inevitable skepticism with detailed analyses of the orbits of other distant objects and months of computer simulations. Scientists say their calculations stack up. Batygin and Brown inferred its presence from the peculiar clustering of six previously known objects that orbit beyond Neptune. If Planet X is out there, Brown and Batygin say, astronomers ought to find more objects in telltale orbits, shaped by the pull of the hidden giant. But Brown knows that no one will really believe in the discovery until Planet X itself appears within a telescope viewfinder. They hope other astronomers will join in the hunt. [and from another]  Most of the planets around other sunlike stars have no single orbital range—that is, some orbit extremely close to their host stars while others follow exceptionally distant orbits. [and from another]  Its presence there would explain a number of mysterious features of the field of icy objects and debris beyond Neptune called the Kuiper Belt. The six most distant objects in that area all follow elliptical orbits that point in the same direction in physical space ? a highly unusual and surprising pattern. [and from another]  Recent analyses have shown that distant orbits within the scattered disk population of the Kuiper Belt exhibit an unexpected clustering in their respective arguments of perihelion. [and from another]  [and from another]  [and from another]  [and from another]  [and from another]  [and from another]  [and from another]  [and from another]

Why is this article simultaneously exploding on major media? It is not describing Nibiru, aka Planet X. It is describing the Sun’s binary twin, which we have  described as being 18.74 Sun-Pluto distances away from the Earth’s Sun. Note this object, termed Planet 9, is described as being “20 times farther away from the sun than Pluto”. Precisely. Zetas right again! We have described this binary twin since the start of the ZetaTalk saga, and the perturbations caused by this binary twin of the Sun have been known to ancient astronomers.

There is great confusion between the Sun’s binary twin and Nibiru, a planet that orbits both foci. Nibiru comes from the direction of the binary twin, and returns in that direction. In the early 1980’s, what is now being termed Planet 9 was being termed Nemesis, and is the reason that NASA/JPL went looking for the source of this perturbation in 1983 with an infrared balloon sent above the atmosphere. They found an object out in the direction of Orion. Nibiru, at that time, was approaching for its next passage around the Sun. A front page article in the Washington Post, published December 31, 1983 documented this search.  

What is the reason for the media blitz at this time? Astronomers are clearly aware of the Sun’s binary twin, and the existence of Nibiru, and have for decades been severely repressed from speaking about these issues. Many deaths have resulted to keep this secret, on the excuse that the public would panic if they knew. Now that Nibiru is so visible that the public is regularly seeing a Second Sun and the brilliant Moon Swirls, as well as the body of Nibiru itself with its double helix of its two most dominant Moon Swirls, the announcement is viewed as inevitable. We have described the planned announcement as a multi-pronged event that cannot be sabotaged. This is one of the prongs.