ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for May 28, 2016

Would the Zetas care to shed some light on the recent TSA nonsense? Terrorism fears, or something else? [and from another] http://bigstory.ap.org/article/413b4e39e6394a64b558c835d0eefd01/tsa-head-expect-more-airport-security-delays-despite-funds The head of the Transportation Security Administration warned travelers to expect long airport security lines to continue during the peak summer travel season despite Congress' shifting of $34 million to the agency. Congress agreed to shift forward the $34 million in TSA funding to let the agency pay overtime to existing staff and hire an extra 768 screeners by June 15. The agency is funneling many of those resources to major hub airports like Chicago's O'Hare International. More resources were needed to address a shortage of screeners. [and from another] http://komonews.com/station/sea-tac-debuts-private-screeners-at-tsa-checkpoints Sea-Tac debuts private screeners at TSA checkpoints. [and from another] http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Airports-Consider-Ditching-TSA-for-Private-Security-379875291.html Airports Consider Ditching TSA for Private Security. [and from another] http://boingboing.net/2016/05/15/phoenix-airport-threatens-to-k.html Phoenix airport threatens to kick out TSA, hire private contractors.

Where lack of funding for adequate TSA staff is being accused of causing the long lines at airports, there is of course more to this picture. TSA has been a fact of life for those wanting to travel by air for years, and this is the first time a crisis of this proportion, on airports across the US, has emerged. What is not being revealed are the directives from Homeland Security, which have steadily included more and more tasks that the TSA must perform. They are responsible for more than padding down passengers, for instance responsible for cargo and baggage coming into the US and inspecting parts and repairs on the airplanes themselves.  

Meanwhile, the specter of terrorism looms ever larger, with ISIS bombing attacks in Europe and Indonesia and Syrian immigrants who cannot be vetted as their homelands are a rubble being recent examples. Terrorists wanting to make a statement may aim to assassinate a Head of State or bomb a nuclear power plant, but these routes are difficult. Far easier is to explode an airplane in the skies. This gets in the news, and the terrorist can claim responsibility even when this is not the case. Airline companies, ever seeking to increase or maintain their profits, advertise travel for vacations, and the American public has come to consider this a birthright.

Thus we have the inevitable clash, where travel for pleasure or business, for vacation or to visit family, or to take advantage of price breaks the travel industry desperate for profits is offering to incite more and more of the public to pack up and head to the airports. We have stressed that airplane travel will get increasingly risky, due to EMP which is already taking planes down in dramatic fashion. If the clash between airline and travel industry profits and the TSA is making the news today, the price of tickets due to the cost of insurance will be next. How many downed planes will it take before the public realizes that casual travel is no longer feasible? Stay home, learn to garden, and corporate profits be damned!

Is this true? Was it deliberate? [and from another] http://investmentwatchblog.com/queen-elizabeth-reveals-she-is-ready-to-flee-britain/ Queen Elizabeth stunned BBC production staff yesterday while preparing to deliver the Queen’s Speech at the State Opening of Parliament, hinting that she is planning to abdicate the throne and flee the UK, a BBC insider claims. ‘One is making the necessary preparations to abandon ship,’ Her Majesty said. ‘A violent storm is coming, the likes of which Britain has never seen.’ Her Majesty was speaking to her advisors while taking on the Parliament Robe of State and Imperial State Crown in the Robing Chamber, however she was already wearing a microphone and her comments were heard by the whole gallery. ‘She seemed angry that she had to remain neutral in her speech.  She said there is solid intelligence from military top brass that if we don’t Brexit there is an inevitable World War 3 scenario that will play out,’ the insider said.  ‘World War 2 will seem like a bump in the road compared to this.  I must warn my subjects,’ the Queen said. The line was cut off at this point and BBC production staff were urgently addressed by the director John Kirby.  He said he had been warned by BBC executives that the Head of State had been ‘shooting her mouth off a lot lately‘ and that ‘we must all ignore, forget, delete from our memories everything that we heard.’ By warning advisors that she has made the necessary preparations to flee the country, is she hinting that she has inside information of the darkest kind?

We have repeatedly been asked about the Queen’s agenda, and have consistently given the same answer during her travels about the world or in meetings with Head of State – she intends to desert her subjects in the UK when the Earth changes make it dangerous to remain and will not give her subjects any warning whatsoever. Meanwhile, the taxpayers in the UK need to support her and her royal family in the opulent style they feel is their right. We made this statement in 2007 when the Queen made a rare visit to the US to seek a commitment from Bush and Cheney. We confirmed this statement in 2010 when the Queen addressed the UN in NYC and again in 2011 when she crossed paths with Obama in Ireland.

Having given up on Obama, the Queen then went shopping in her Comonwealth countries, visiting New Zealand and Australia in 2013, then sending Kate and William with their adorable new baby in 2014 to plea again to Obama for the royal treatment in the Aftertime these British royals feel is their due. Scotland was defrauded during their independence bid in 2014 so the Queen could retain her Balmoral estates in the highlands there. By 2015, having been granted only a residence but refused the royal treatment everywhere, the Queen focused on sticking it out as long as possible in the UK. Of course, London was expected to be flooding due to tidal sloshing and full of rioting immigrants, so a royal excuse for leaving Buckingham Palace was concocted.

Has the Queen become loose lipped due to age? Have the increasing Earth changes forcing the creeping announcement admitting the presence and pending passage of Nibiru unhinged her? Are the threats from ISIS sleeper cells infiltrating the UK the source of her dire warnings about the Brexit and World War 3? In that there are several sources for the quotes attributed to the Queen, and all of these from insiders loyal to the Queen and aware of the pending passage of Nibiru and the long running cover-up keeping the public in the dark, one should read the words attributed to her accordingly. The”violent storm” is of course the passage of Nibiru, when she will “abandon ship” and leave the UK. Any claim that this is Brexit related or that she wants to warn her subjects is false.  

Today, Microsoft and Google announced that they are teaming up to build a Trans-Atlantic cable to connect the USA and Europe.  This cable is said to be the highest capacity cable ever run and is being placed in a region of the Atlantic not occupied by other cabling.  The article remarks how it is strange that only two companies are teaming up for such an endeavor.  The Zetas have said in the past the both companies are preparing for the Aftertime hoping to have some technology in place.  Yet with the Atlantic set to increase in size greatly during the Shift, this idea seems foolish.  Would the Zetas care to discuss it? [and from another]  http://techcrunch.com/2016/05/26/microsoft-and-facebook-are-building-the-fastest-trans-atlantic-cable-yet/  Microsoft and Facebook today announced that they are teaming up to build a subsea cable across the Atlantic that will connect Virginia Beach, Virginia, with Bilbao, Spain. Construction is scheduled to start in August and the companies expect the process to be complete in October 2017. Once operational, MAREA will be the highest-capacity subsea cable to cross the Atlantic (at least for the time being) and will feature eight fiber pairs. Typically, companies like Microsoft and Facebook have joined larger consortiums of technology companies and telecom players to build — or invest in — these cables. Now, however, the two decided to build their own infrastructure instead (and they are using some of the open hardware approach that Facebook has become known for) and plan on selling excess capacity to third parties. The companies did not share any information about what these efforts will cost.

Immensely wealthy internet companies such as Microsoft and Facebook and Google have an interest in keeping the Internet functional in the face of failing satellite service. We long predicted that satellites would fail, consistently, going into the passage and where these failures are carefully kept from the public, they are occurring at an increasing rate. The trend is obvious. Where the Internet is essentially the life blood of a company, they would spare no expense trying to maintain the Internet. They have few options. The Earth changes will bring an onslaught against the Internet.

Where structured from the start to survive, routing packets in alternate directions when blocked, the Internet and its servers are nonetheless electronic, subject to electro-magnetic pulse, and mechanical, subject to torn cables and satellites torn from the skies. Land lines, or submarine lines, are obviously the most durable. In that the Atlantic already has a plethora of cables connecting Europe with N America, why lay another? This new MAREA cable will attempt to protect against EMP and be slack enough to allow the Atlantic to expand. It is also being laid just above where the African Roll will create a void between plate borders, thus hopefully reducing the stress on the new MAREA cable cross point.